Fragment no 1. “Concerning basics for my 'Theory of Archetypal Hero'”
¶1
In
general, because, as we put it above, substance is in itself or
implicitly Subject, all contents of its own reflection into
itself. 1Substance
is therefore self-identity. It is but nothing that a pure
abstraction; but it is a what we call a thinking.
¶2
Being
is Thought. It is an
abstraction of itself from itself, or it is itself its lack of
self-identity and its dissolution. Withdrawal into itself,
its own becoming.
¶3
On the contrary, since our knowing is not reflection from its
contents.
Those
three argument approve my Hegelian thesis about the “Archetypal
Hero”
Explanation
Hegel calls and
classified all the experiences of rationalism under terminus
universal; formalized into the
abstract form, as a lifeless universal. The first philosophical
school was talking about the major theme of “Being” for the very
first time. This mere abstraction, is therefore negative, brings
itself its negative if we look back on the basics of all rationalism
and revolution during time of I. Kant;
the negation is similarly immediate aspect, it is “Nothing”. By
abstracting away the concreteness of the actual experience, one is
left with being, which is nothing. This process, process of
abstraction is also used by Hegel in phrase “doing away”.
Being and
Nothing are thus identical, the
truth of being and nothing is the unity of the two, which makes a
trio – the unity is “Becoming”. Unity of becoming does not
obliterate Being and nothing, but holds both tension in a higher
truth. This part of contradiction, divided into two modes, thus this
is what unites or overcomes (or even destruct) them, we can discover
the general triad. This method of overcoming contradictions by moving
to a higher level of truth is known as the Dialectic.
Hegel's own special systematic logic divided from idea inspired by
human history – never-ending development, a circle, but what more,
a spiral; all functioning as a support and tool for development of
Hegelian vision, and proofs as well.
The dialectical system
of reality are three foundation Triad of Being:
BEING, NOTION, BECOMING
BEING, ESSENCE, NOTION
IDEA, NATURE, MIND
The “Other” is an acknowledgment of the
self-consciousness of the possibility, but if there is the Other, the
original self-consciousness feels threaten, but certainly the master
supposes to be the subject. Requires absolute freedom and domination,
but more problems will be explained later on this point. It asserts
it and is trying by domination in mode of a master and servant. But
most important is a fact that the ensuing struggle results in a
master who dominates, and a servant who is dominated. The very master
abstract its forces, but the servant is producing material of goods
for the enjoyment of the master. (!)
At this point, master is slowly becoming to be depended
upon the servant he has dominated.
First, on this place ,master depends upon the servant,
while the master has been consuming or destructing what servant
makes, thus the servant had been learning to create...to bend nature
into his own will.
Establishing his own
self-consciousness and suddenly, the roles are slowly
changing.2
References
For the aprovement of “The Archetypal Hero”
¶1
G.F.W.Hegel, Phenomenology of Spirit, Preface. Translated
by A.V. Miller, Oxford Univ. Press, 1977, p.
33, 31
¶2
G.F.W.Hegel, Phenomenology of Spirit, Preface. Translated
by A.V. Miller, Oxford Univ. Press, 1977, p.
32
¶3
G.F.W.Hegel, Phenomenology of Spirit, Preface. Translated
by A.V. Miller, Oxford Univ. Press, 1977, p.
33
1The
self-moving Soul realized the contents of the very movement of being
that immediately is, consist partly in becoming than other than
itself, and thus becoming its own immanent content. Partly taking it
back into itself unfolding existence, i.e., in making itself into
a moment. And therefore simplifying into something different.
2See
my notes on “Archetypal Hero”
