Human is not a concept or conception

In 1927 M. Heidegger issued his critical overcoming of a metaphysical
conceiving  the human nature. That cannot be mater of a categories under
determination of an objectivity, because in that case human, mankind, would
be declassified on the level which is described (maybe just partly but still is)
in philosophy of Rene Descartes*1*, where we can observe that human has
mostly object-like qualities. This was, thanks to Hegel*2*, finally solved in the
first scientifical try of overcoming the problem of duality of a human soul.
Thus human is an “existential”.

The true shape, in which truest-exists dwells, can only be the scientific
system of such a truth:


¶1 to help bringing the philosophy closer to the form of science is love
to knowing, thus formally: actual knowing. The actual knowing is inner
necessity so far setting aside accidental matter of a person and motivation;
the truth exists only in what is called religion of being, thus knowledge of the
Absolute. By suppressing the differentiation of the Notion and restoring the
feeling of the essential being is “desire to bite”.

¶2 In it-self, that life is indeed one of an untroubled quality, and
unity with itself, for which otherness and alienation are not serious maters;
but in it-self, in abstract universality, in which the naturality of the divine,
altogether, left our investigation of the account. If the form is declared to be
same as the essence, then it is a mistake to suppose that cognition can be satisfied with the in-itself essence, but can get along with the form.

¶3 The true is the whole. But the whole is nothing but the
essence consummating itself through its development. For mediation is
nothing beyond self moving self-same-ness, or is reflection into self, the
moment of the “I” which is for itself pure negativity, or when is reduced to
its pure abstraction; thus simple becoming. Pure self-recognition is absolute
otherness.

“Dasein” and Being

This Heideggerian term cannot be translated but transform into
a phrase “being-there-at-the-presence”. Human is thrown into the world by
force of Dasein, and thus begins his Being. The question of being is
extremely important for entire phenomenology. The human being is everytime under “Stimmung”, kind of “instrumentalisation of moods”, under
which is certain human influenced. The most radical is “Angs”, that brings us
to an existence in-itself beyond our own being. It shows us our own being in a
way that opens the emptiest space of the whole emptiness: our possible nonexistence, because it opens the hidden fact of the very “Nothing”.

Definition:

Let's try to ask on this question. What is “nothing”? Already the first impression shows something unusual. Already “nothing” is understandable as
a considering of “something”. Exactly from being we can derivate
differences. The question that asks on the essence of what is nothing –shows
us an antinomycal position. So that is the reason why the question is loosing
its object.

By this theory is impossible to answer; thus this even making the “logic”
without basics of logic; universal “logic”. If the thinking which is always about
something thus simply we can determinate “Nothing” as a antinomy of
human thinking.

Is but possible to break logic? With the human reason we can make
“Nothing” as a problem. Nothing is negation of all that exists. Although here,
“Nothing” is determination of a question of the higher position that has the
antinomy of an antinomy. Negating of something is one of the common idea
of “logic”. Specifically act of the reason. How is that possible to talk about
nothing? No – as a negation means higher determination of that is under
question of nothing as a different question of negation? It is the reason inside
negation of existence the conception “No”? This question is not yet quite well
successfully formulated. Nothing is more original that No, and negation.
Negation is an act of human reason as a negation of act of reason. Thus even
reason is based upon nothing. How is that possible that reason is developing
a result of question about nothing? If we can ask about nothing –on “no” by itself, it must be somehow behind us. We must get acquaintance with and
within it.

Total versatility of being must be determinate before the negation, where
appears “nothing”.

Thus Dasein is not only an interface of our possible non-existence that
evokes our mortality, but also indicated temporality of being that has several
characters, like a “scheduling” or operation, which means the “activity”. But
Heidegger did not stop at the anthropological phase of his philosophy, he
went even father.

“Kehre”, or The “Reverse”

Heidegger is exterminating the “space-times”, the epochs, or
the “retentions” as a fragments of human thinking throughout the human
history from Aproximedros to Nietzsche. The conception of being is for
Heidegger shown as chreon in Anaximadros, Plato’s idea, energeia in case
of Aristotle and Descartes’ perceptio. In the philosophy of I. Kant it was
Vorstellen and Shelling’s Wille. What is the collected denominator?

The mentioned temporality of being, even one step up, Dasein,
is loosing its temporal meaning, thus the position of meaning of being is
forced to be locked in the “permanent presence”.
The force of the permanent presence makes again such an
emptiness, but now in the meaning of being, thus presence itself as a
“Nihil”; the fact that every-thing was like, is like and will be alike, means that
it is a pure “Nothing”. Suspendation of a temporality, the suspendation of a
time of being itself is dominating thought of the late Heideggerian system of
thinking.

“Ge-Stell”

The “Total manipulation”, that is nivelising the space, also the time, what
there was, and also what there will be, is always throughout the whole
Absolute, The True is available and removable, thus replaceable. Therefore
the most extreme sense of being is total emptiness of itself.
There is only one “Task of Thinking” and the last possibility for being under
the totality of Ge-Stell:

Constantly re-think every-thing. Train the
techniques to receive the adequate view of being-at-presence, and
make ourselves available from the position of each being of Dasein
to reformat ourselves to be required to any kind of being. Thus then
train ourselves to not being treated and absorbed by Dasein.

All is a mater of TIME.
-----
*1* R. Descartes,
*2* G.W. Friedrich Hegel,